Mulligan v. McGregor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the ALJ drew an impermissible negative inference based on the claimant’s inconsistent treatment history where good causes, including the inability to pay for medications, explained gaps in treatment
• finding that the ALJ drew an impermissible negative inference based on the claimant's inconsistent treatment history where good causes, including the inability to pay for medications, explained gaps in treatment
• remanding because “if the [ignored] opinions had been properly evaluated by the ALJ, the weight of the evidence could have shifted in Plaintiff’s favor”
• remanding because “if the opinions had been properly evaluated by the ALJ, the weight of the evidence could have shifted in Plaintiff’s favor”
• remanding because “if the [ignored] opinions had been properly evaluated by the ALJ, the weight of the evidence could have shifted in Plaintiff’s favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).