Skip to main content
· 11/5/1952

Mulligan v. Dunlap

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 296
  • 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that class action was not superior where debt collector’s net worth was unknown
  • “Typicality is inherent in Bryant’s class in that each class member was subjected to the same alleged FDCPA violation when they were sent the dunning letter.” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Youngdahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.