Muller v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion for summary judgment and observing that where prior horror franchises served as independent sources of a film, no inference of copying could be drawn as to “element[s] occur[ring] both in the defendant’s prior work and the plaintiff’s prior work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).