Skip to main content
· 5/23/1874

Muller v. Stemmler

Citations

  • 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we can only review “any legal error with respect to the application of the law to those facts established in the BIA’s decision”
  • noting Patel and stating that “[b]ecause we cannot disturb . . . factual finding[s], we are left to see if Flores-Alonso has identified any legal error with respect to the application of the law to those facts established in the BIA’s decision.”
  • “As long as the BIA cites and proceeds to apply the proper legal standard, as it did in this case, we cannot make legal error out of an inherently subjective determination of whether an applicant’s relatives will experience exceptional and ex- tremely unusual hardship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAdam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.