Muller v. Muller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that, in agreeing to a stipulation regarding visitation, parties implicitly consented to the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction; holding that “[o]nly the enabling legislation, in this case the UCCJA, can confer subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Giulietti v. Giulietti
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-02· cited 101×
• In Re Jorgensen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 23×
• Lehan v. Lehan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-05· cited 10×
• In Re Iliana M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-09· cited 8×
• Weinstein v. Weinstein
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-23· cited 4×
• Durkin v. Durkin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-12-03· cited 3×
• Upon the Petition of Jorgensen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 1×
• Fox v. Fox
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-09-09
• Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-02-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Billington v. Billington
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 218×
• Figueroa v. C & S Ball Bearing
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-14· cited 218×
• Lukas v. City of New Haven
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-05-12· cited 139×
• Kioukis v. Kioukis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-11· cited 44×
• Brown v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-01-29· cited 41×
• Simms v. Simms
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-07-09· cited 32×
• Hurtado v. Hurtado
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-05-03· cited 24×
• Filipetti v. Filipetti
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1984-08-21· cited 22×
• Grynkewich v. McGinley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-04-16· cited 16×
• Cellu Tissue Corp. v. Blake Equipment Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-21· cited 12×