Muller v. Gabon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel are “considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
• recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel “are considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
• holding “no qualified right of public access to juvenile court proceedings . . . to determine custody of a minor child”
• \The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.\
• “The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.”
• juvenile courts differ from courts of general jurisdiction in that “[hjearings are informal, and based on an inquisitorial model rather than an adversarial one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).