Muller v. Automobile Club of So. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two remarks by a supervisor, and one by a coworker, did not constitute an actionable “ ‘concerted pattern of harassment of a repeated, routine or a generalized nature’ ”
• asserting that in 1992 “the Legislature intended to conform California’s employment discrimination statutes to the ADA”
• concluding that the word “includes” may be expansive or limiting
• Plaintiffs “causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing are barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act because they seek damages arising out of alleged discrimination based on a work-related injury.”
• mental disability requires substantial limitation of major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).