Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It was plainly the duty of plaintiff to do all he could to make his loss as small as possible.\
• “It was plainly the duty of plaintiff to do all he could to make his loss as small as possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. Public Service Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1934-09-18· cited 19×
• Miralago Corp. v. Village of Kenilworth
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1937-05-10· cited 11×
• Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. Illinois Iowa Power Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1939-11-29· cited 5×
• Mci Commc'ns, Inc. v. Maverick Cutting & Breaking LLC
  D. Maine· 2019-03-12· cited 4×
• City of Fairbanks v. Gilbertson
  D. Alaska· 1957-01-04· cited 4×
• Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-07-14· cited 2×
• Devers v. Long Island Lighting Co.
  Suffolk County District Court· 1974-01-18

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-05-03· cited 14×

Other cases named Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-07-14· cited 2×