Skip to main content
· 6/2/1993

Mullen v. Alarmguard of Delmarva, Inc.

Citations

  • 625 A.2d 258
  • 1993 Del. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 15(a) “directs the liberal granting of amendments ‘when justice so requires.’ . . . In the absence of prejudice to another party, the trial court is required to exercise its discretion in favor of granting leave to amend.”
  • providing “[M]isconception of identity of parties within the meaning of Rule 15(c) extends to additional parties as well as named, original parties.”
  • discussing three requirements for relation back of amendment against new party to action
  • “Whether a proposed amendment satisfies the requirements of Rule 15(c) is at the trial court’s discretion.”
  • “Delay alone is not a sufficient basis to deny amendment of the pleadings, although inexcusable delay and repeated attempts at amendment may justify denial.”
  • “as to ‘content,’ the notice must be given of the ‘institution of the action,’ and that can only mean the lawsuit, not merely of a claim or allegation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Walsh, Berger, Del, Const

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.