Mullarky v. Trautvetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Subsection (B) allows prior consistent statements to be introduced to rebut charges of ‘improper influence or motive.’ (quoting Indiana Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(B) as it read at that time)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).