Mullarkey v. Tamboer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a motion to dismiss pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7012 is governed by standard plausibility requirements
• explaining that res judicata bars claims that were brought, or could have been brought, in a previous action
• explaining that the doctrine of res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars claims that were brought or could have been brought in a previous action
• noting that the entire controversy doctrine requires a party to bring all related claims in a single action “against a particular adversary or be precluded from bringing a second action based on the omitted claims against that party”
• explaining res judicata bars claims brought in prior action and claims that “could have been brought”
• explaining that res judicata bars claims that were, or could have been, brought where: (1) a final judgment on the merits was entered in a prior suit; (2) involving the same parties or their privies; (3) and the subsequent action is based on the same cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).