Mullaney v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that licensing fee for nonresident commercial fishermen constituted discriminatory tax in violation of Privileges and Immunities Clause
• holding that the clause applied to Alaska, which was a territory on its way to becoming a state
• holding that the clause applied to Alaska, which was a territory on its way to becoming a state
• holding that licensing fee for nonresident commercial fishermen constituted discriminatory tax in violation of Privileges and Immunities Clause
• holding that the Privileges and Immunities Clause “would bar any State from imposing” a $5 license fee on resident fishers and a $50 fee on .non-residents unless a State offered a substantial, closely related justification at the second step of the inquiry
• holding that the Privileges and MARILLEY V. BONHAM 11 Immunities Clause “would bar any State from imposing” a $5 license fee on resident fishers and a $50 fee on non-residents unless a State offered a substantial, closely related justification at the second step of the inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).