Mulina v. Item Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• article and headlines had no defamatory meaning because of three words in an explanatory paragraph, which were not in any way set apart from other material on the page

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Greenberg v. Burglass
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-11-10· cited 56×
• Fernandes v. Tenbruggencate
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-08-26· cited 42×
• Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-03-02· cited 33×
• State v. Stahl
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1958-12-15· cited 28×
• State v. Eubanks
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1960-11-07· cited 26×
• Juneau v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-02-05· cited 18×
• Molin v. Trentonian
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-02-03· cited 17×
• Forrest v. Lynch
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-06-13· cited 7×
• In re Consumers Power Co. Securities Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 1985-09-30· cited 7×
• Walker v. Associated Press
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1964-02-13· cited 6×
• Bellis v. Times-Picayune
  E.D. Louisiana· 1964-01-20· cited 4×
• Fleming v. Michot
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1974-05-28· cited 3×
• Stanton v. Metro Corp.
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-03-07· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State ex rel. Phelps v. Judge of the Civil District Court
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1893-11-15· cited 15×
• Tate v. Nicholson Pub. Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1908-11-16· cited 13×