Mulhall v. Hannafin
Citations
- 45 A.D.3d 55
- 841 N.Y.S.2d 282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “manufacturer’s duty is to warn only of those dangers it knows of or are reasonably foreseeable”
- “[Plaintiffs had to show that had the warning been different, Dr. Hannafin would have departed from her normal practice and used another device.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reed v. Pfizer, Inc.E.D. New York· 2012-03-14· cited 60×
- Tears v. Bos. Scientific Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-29· cited 34×
- Davids v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.E.D. New York· 2012-04-19· cited 25×
- Alston v. CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.S.D. New York· 2009-11-20· cited 21×
- Valente v. Textron, Inc.E.D. New York· 2013-03-18· cited 18×
- Trisvan v. HeymanE.D. New York· 2018-03-30· cited 17×
- Ramos v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-01-31· cited 15×
- McDowell v. Eli Lilly & Co.S.D. New York· 2014-11-07· cited 12×
- Pearsall v. Medtronics, Inc.E.D. New York· 2015-12-07· cited 11×
- Buono v. Tyco Fire Prods., LPSecond Circuit· 2023-08-24· cited 11×
- Chandler v. Janssen Pharm., Inc.E.D. New York· 2018-06-29· cited 7×
- Christison v. Biogen Idec Inc.D. Utah· 2016-08-05· cited 5×
- Colarossi v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-01-07· cited 4×
- Byrd v. Janssen Pharm., Inc.N.D. New York· 2018-09-21· cited 4×
- Castorina v. A.C. & S.New York Supreme Court· 2017-01-09· cited 2×
- Ford v. RiinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-04-26
- Hempstead v. Hammer & Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-01-02
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-04-01· cited 8,959×
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1992-03-31· cited 148×
- Martin v. HackerNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-23· cited 108×
- Buchholz v. Trump 767 Fifth Avenue, LLCNew York Court of Appeals· 2005-06-09· cited 46×
- Glucksman v. Halsey Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-04-10· cited 41×
- Krasnopolsky v. Warner-Lambert Co.E.D. New York· 1992-07-13· cited 28×
- Sosna v. American Home ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-10-08· cited 24×
- Kaempfe v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1964-05-21· cited 18×
- Schrader v. Sunnyside Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-08-26· cited 18×
- Kaempfe v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1967-10-24· cited 13×
- Daley v. McNeil Consumer Products Co.S.D. New York· 2001-09-07· cited 9×
- Goldberg v. Union Hardware Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-06-25· cited 8×
- Andre v. Mecta Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-09-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.