Mulford v. States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the typicality requirement met where the named plaintiffs and the putative class alleged “injur[ies] stemming from Defendant’s alleged false representations and the effect of those false representations on the market”
• “Cammer emphasized that coverage by analysts of a company increases the availability of information about a company’s stock, thus increasing the likelihood that investors rely on said information, indicating an efficient market.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).