Mulford v. French

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, to establish a claim of disability discrimination under the FHAA, a plaintiff must show that she suffers from a handicap as defined by the statute
• noting that “physical 10 accommodations” are governed by § 3604(f)(3)(A), rather than § 3604(f)(3)(B)
• “Imposition of burdensome policies ... can interfere with disabled persons’ right to use and enjoyment of their dwellings, thus necessitating accommodation.”
• reasonable accommodation under FHA imposes neither \fundamental alteration in\ challenged policy or \undue financial or administrative burdens\ on accommodating party
• the necessity 3 element of a Fair Housing Act claim requires a “causal link between [the defendant]’s failure to 4 accommodate and [the plaintiff]’s disability”
• an accommodation is reasonable when it does 20 not impose any (1) “fundamental alteration in the nature of the program” or (2) “undue financial or 21 administrative burdens”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).