Mule v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the employee was not acting in the scope of employment after he left for a picnic at 1 p.m. and was not expected to return but returned to place of employment around 8:15 p.m. in order to shower and change his clothes
• expressly adopting positional risk doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).