· 2/3/2004
Muldrow v. Herbert
Citations
- 299 F. Supp. 2d 166
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1481
- 2004 WL 225073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]n allegedly inconsistent verdict does not present a constitutional violation. Therefore, such a claim is not even cognizable on habeas review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.