Mulder v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the relevant Connecticut statute, the municipality owed “no duty to the plaintiff to require the general contractor to post a payment bond”
• noting that when Connecticut legislation is “patterned after and operate [s] in general conformity with the federal statutes ... we look to federal judicial interpretations . . . for guidance” [citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]
• Subcontractor does not have private cause of action against town where town fails to secure a payment bond from general contractor on municipal project pursuant to General Statutes § 49-41
• finding no liability for failing to require a bond
• finding no liability for failing to require a bond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).