Mui v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Vermont courts have adopted the same restriction as federal courts in terms of only hearing cases where actual controversies exist between the parties and thus only allow parties having standing to raise claims in Vermont courts
• explaining that Vermont courts have adopted the same restriction as federal courts in terms of only hearing cases where actual controversies exist between the parties and thus only allow parties having standing to raise claims in Vermont courts
• explaining that Vermont courts have adopted the same restriction as federal courts in terms of hearing only cases where actual controversies exist between the parties and thus only allow parties who meet the requirements for standing in federal courts to raise claims in Vermont courts
• explaining that Vermont courts have adopted the same restriction as federal courts in terms of hearing only cases where actual controversies exist between the parties and thus only allow parties who meet the requirements for standing in federal courts to raise claims in Vermont courts
• “Vermont Courts are vested with subject matter jurisdiction only over actual cases or controversies involving litigants with adverse interests.”
• “Vermont has adopted this requirement and with it the requirement that for plaintiffs to have standing to bring a case, they must have suffered a particular injury that is attributable to the defendant and that can be redressed by a court of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).