Skip to main content
· 6/27/1899

Muhlenberg v. City of Tacoma

Citations

  • 21 Wash. 306
  • 57 P. 811
  • 1899 Wash. LEXIS 281

Syllabus

<p>EVIDENCE-TIME OE PRESENTATION OE WARRANTS — EEEECT OE TREASURER’S INDORSEMENT.</p> <p>The mere manual indorsement of city warrants by a treasurer, “ Not paid for want of funds,” is simply a ministerial act; and, whether made at the time of presentation or subsequent to his term of office, would be, at most, but evidence of their presentation.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.