· 7/1/1855
Muhlenberg v. Brock
Citations
- 25 Pa. 517
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding of unnecessary hardship supported by testimony of prior tenant, realtor and a neighboring land owner that traffic volume, noise, lights, water run-off and dust related to surrounding uses rendered property unsuitable for residential use
- this court upheld lower court’s reversal of zoning hearing board’s denial of use variance where applicant had knowledge of hardship when property was purchased
- “the lack of evidence showing attempts to sell the property is not fatal where, as here, other evidence has established that the land cannot reasonably be used as zoned”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.