Skip to main content
· 2/28/1975

Muhlenberg Township School District Authority v. Pennsylvania Fortunato Construction Co.

Citations

  • 333 A.2d 184
  • 460 Pa. 260
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arbitrator, not the court, must decide the question of whether demand for arbitration is timely since it involves the interpretation of the agreement
  • holding that the issue of whether a contractor’s demand for arbitration was timely must be resolved by the arbitrators as it is a matter of interpretation of the agreement
  • question of whether contractor’s demand for arbitration under contract with the school district was timely was one of interpretation of the contract and not one of existence or scope of arbitration provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.