Muhammad v. Walmart Stores East, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the 21–day safe harbor does not apply [when sanctions are initiated by a court sua sponte] and the court may impose sanctions without providing opportunity to withdraw the misstatement.”
• noting that sanctions 24 issued pursuant to a motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
• noting that sanctions may issue “pursuant to a motion by opposing counsel” upon a showing of “objectively unreasonable” conduct
• noting that sanctions issued on a party’s motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
• noting that sanctions issued on a party’s motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
• “[S]ua sponte sanctions ... should issue only upon a finding of subjective bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Muhammad v. Walmart Stores East, L.P.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Muhammad v. Walmart Stores East, L.P.
  Second Circuit· 2013-10-09
• Muhammad v. Walmart Stores East, L.P.
  Second Circuit· 2013-10-09