Skip to main content
· 3/16/2006

Muhammad v. Muhammad-Rahmah

Citations

  • 844 N.E.2d 49
  • 363 Ill. App. 3d 407
  • 300 Ill. Dec. 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that motions to reconsider that do not raise any new law or facts are reviewed de novo
  • explaining that motions to reconsider that do not raise any new law or facts are reviewed de novo
  • finding the appointment of a custodian preferable over dissolution where the parties “have made it apparent that this Corporation still serves a vital interest in the community” and “its compulsory absence would only be a detriment to the congregation it currently serves”
  • abuse of discretion standard applied where motion to reconsider was based on a new legal theory
  • review of the denial of a motion to reconsider based only on the circuit court’s application of existing law is de novo
  • “[t]he burden of proof in a 5 No. 1-25-0053 civil proceeding generally rests on the party seeking relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.