Muhammad v. Dallas County Community Supervision & Corrections Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the district court’s holding after it solely relied on federal case law without considering state law and factual evidence to determine whether defendant was plaintiff’s employer under Title VII
• reversing dismissal of Title VII claims “and remand[ing] so the district court can make further factual findings about the nature and circumstances of Muhammad’s position as a probation officer and consider whether [the defendant] was his employer for Title VII purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).