Muhammad Chaudhry v. Michael Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when weighing credibility, an ALJ may consider a claimant’s daily activities
• holding that when weighing credibility, an ALJ may consider a claimant’s daily activities
• holding ALJ was reasonable in relying on objective medical evidence of claimant’s 28 1 functioning over claimant’s subjective testimony
• stating that an ALJ need not accept the opinion of any physician if that opinion is brief, con-clusory, and inadequately supported by clinical findings
• noting that an ALJ may consider claimant’s activities when weighing credibility
• including failure to seek mental health treatment in reasons the ALJ properly relied on to reject a medical opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).