Skip to main content
· 7/17/1981

Muenster Butane, Inc., Etc. v. The Stewart Company (Penteco, Inc., Substituted in Place and Stead of the Stewart Company)

Citations

  • 651 F.2d 292
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • supplier refusal to provide dealer with model of television set intended to discourage dealer free-riding on the promotional efforts of a competing dealer
  • “Proof of the antitrust defendant’s ‘substantial’ market power should be a preliminary hurdle in all restricted distributor (vertical restraint) cases.”
  • “Comparison of the effects of any vertical restriction on intrabrand and interbrand competition is the critical analysis required”
  • defendant’s efforts to restrict intrabrand competition largely ineffectual, intrabrand competition continued unabated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Coleman, Ainsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.