Skip to main content
· 10/5/1978

Muench v. Oxley

Citations

  • 584 P.2d 939
  • 90 Wash. 2d 637
  • 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a clear, cogent, and convincing standard for acquiescence claims but referring to substantial evidence in an adverse possession analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.