Mueller v. PA. STATE POLICE HDQTRS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hen faced with a demurrer, the pertinent inquiry for a reviewing court is to determine whether the petitioner has stated on the face of his petition a cause of action that, if proved, would entitle him to relief”
• holding that “[w]hen faced with a demurrer, the pertinent inquiry for a reviewing court is to determine whether the [plaintiff] has stated on the face of his [complaint] a cause of action that, if proved, would entitle him to relief”
• holding that “[w]hen faced with a demurrer, the pertinent inquiry for a reviewing court is to determine whether the petitioner has 6 stated on the face of his petition a cause of action that, if proved, would entitle him to relief”
• observing that department policy does not require its employees to initiate or file a criminal complaint
• indicating that pleadings filed by pro se litigants are to be construed liberally
• indicating that pleadings filed by pro se litigants are to be construed liberally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).