Skip to main content
· 3/22/1971

Mueller v. Craven

Citations

  • 401 U.S. 979
  • 28 L. Ed. 2d 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a radio installed in a locomotive to provide two-way communication between the engine and yard employees was an “appurtenance” within the meaning of the Boiler Inspection Act.
  • the fact that one acts in the capacity of an independent contractor does not preclude a finding that a work was done for hire
  • additions “too insubstantial” to induce owner to share copyright
  • radio; no ICC rule implicated
  • no contractual relationship between parties
  • no contractual relationship between parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.