Mudgett v. Liebes
Citations
- 14 Wash. 482
- 45 P. 19
- 1896 Wash. LEXIS 392
Syllabus
<p>OFFICERS — COMPENSATION — AMENDMENT AND RE-ENACTMENT OF STATUTE.</p> <p>An office is not abolished by a statute which repeals a portion of a former statute respecting the duties of the office but omits a provision as to compensation.</p> <p>The attempt to deprive a county treasurer of the compensation which the law at the time of his election gave him for duties as city tax collector, while leaving him still under obligation to perform such duties, is in conflict with art. 11, §8, of the state constitution, which prohibits the salary of an officer to be increased or diminished during his term of office.</p>
Judges: Anders, Dunbar, Gordon, Hoyt, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. Dudley v. DaggettWashington Supreme Court· 1902-03-20· cited 23×
- Callvert v. WinsorWashington Supreme Court· 1901-11-27· cited 16×
- Robinson v. BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court· 1901-12-06· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Davis v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1907-10-19· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Plaisie v. ColeWashington Supreme Court· 1905-11-13· cited 10×
- Parosa v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1960-12-22· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Olmstead v. MudgettWashington Supreme Court· 1899-04-22· cited 6×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.