Skip to main content

Muckle v. State

Citations

  • 705 S.E.2d 721
  • 307 Ga. App. 634
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 173
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “although [the defendant] offered testimony that conflicted with the State’s version of events, it was the role of the jury[ ] ... to assess the credibility of the witnesses and decide whose testimony to accept or reject.”
  • attempting to discard evidence can serve as circumstantial evidence of guilt
  • attempting to discard evidence can serve as circumstantial evidence of guilt
  • the continued use of force after the “imminent danger justifying self-defense ha[s] passed” does not qualify as self-defense. (Citation and 7 punctuation omitted.)
  • the continued use of force after the “imminent danger justifying self-defense has passed” does not qualify as self-defense
  • eyewitness testimony was sufficient by itself to sustain conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Blackwell, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.