Mucha v. Village of Oak Brook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding testimony inconclusive, and therefore not sufficient to establish a genuine dispute of material fact, where plaintiff testified that he could not recall when or whether an event occurred
• “In evaluating probable cause, we look only to the information known to the officer at the time of arrest....”
• plaintiff’s testimony that he “could not recall” whether event occurred was “inconclusive” and so “cannot by itself create a genuine factual dispute”
• when there is no constitutional violation, defendants “do not require the additional protection of qualified immunity.”
• plaintiff’s testimony that he “could not recall” whether event occurred was “inconclusive” and so “cannot by itself create a genuine factual dispute”
• when there is no constitutional violation, defendants \do not require the additional protection of qualified immunity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).