Skip to main content
· 10/17/2017

Mt. Morris Sportsmen's Ass'n v. Boyers

Citations

  • 173 A.3d 254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a water rights applicant could not substitute records of use made through an undecreed point of diversion to establish historical beneficial use
  • noting that the meaning of “beneficial use” “tracks legislative enactments, court decisions, and, principally, the acts of appropriators who control water to their purposes” (emphasis added)
  • stating \the engineer's administration decisions do not determine the property rights of appropriators\
  • stating \the engineer's administration decisions do not determine the property rights of appropriators\
  • unlawful use of water for over 30 years could not be considered for determining historic use
  • \[The right to change a water right is limited to that amount of water actually used beneficially pursuant to the decree at the appropriator's place of use.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.