Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. v. Township of Mount Holly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs established a prima facie case of disparate impact under the FHA by presenting statistical evidence showing the redevelopment plan would disproportionately affect minority residents
• “The FHA can be violated by either intentional discrimination or if a practice has a disparate impact on a protected class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).