Skip to main content
· 11/15/1968

Mroz v. Dravo Corporation

Citations

  • 293 F. Supp. 499
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding jury verdict of liability despite company doctor’s 6 fit-for-duty slip because captains and crew of diesel vessels knew of seaman’s emphysema and should have known that work amidst noxious fumes would exacerbate her condition
  • fit-for-duty slip from hospital was not conclusive of plaintiff’s fitness to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.