· 12/13/1999
Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.
Citations
- 197 F.3d 1276
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 12528
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9725
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32372
- 1999 WL 1132969
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- looking to Nevada cost-shifting law to determine the proper taxing of attorneys’ fees under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2)
- reviewing the decision of a district court to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to state law for abuse of discretion
- “In a federal question action where the federal court is exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state claims, the federal court applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Schroeder, Alarcon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.