Skip to main content
· 12/13/1999

Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.

Citations

  • 197 F.3d 1276
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 12528
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9725
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32372
  • 1999 WL 1132969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking to Nevada cost-shifting law to determine the proper taxing of attorneys’ fees under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2)
  • reviewing the decision of a district court to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to state law for abuse of discretion
  • “In a federal question action where the federal court is exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state claims, the federal court applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Schroeder, Alarcon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.