Mr. Water Heater Enterprises, Inc. v. 1-800-Hot Water Heater, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While Plaintiffs rely on the incontestable status of the [mark], it is a relatively weak mark when examined against the likelihood of confusion in the relevant market.”
• “While Plaintiffs rely on the incontestable status of the [mark], it is a relatively weak mark when examined against the likelihood of confusion in the relevant market.”
• “[B]ecause the . . . [m]ark is not limited to words contained in a logo, a trier of fact could reasonably conclude that Plaintiffs’ incontestable word mark is inherently strong. Thus, with respect to inherent distinctiveness, the . . . [m]ark exhibits some strength.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).