Skip to main content
· 6/10/1994

M.P. v. Schwartz

Citations

  • 853 F. Supp. 164
  • 1994 WL 199857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “special solicitude for the privacy of a minor is a pervasive feature of American law”
  • recognizing that “special solicitude for the privacy of a minor is a pervasive feature of American law”
  • finding public’s interest in access, satisfied by release of complaint with plaintiffs’ names redacted
  • authorizing redaction of complaint to include only initials of minor plaintiff and her family

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Messitte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.