· 6/10/1994
M.P. v. Schwartz
Citations
- 853 F. Supp. 164
- 1994 WL 199857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “special solicitude for the privacy of a minor is a pervasive feature of American law”
- recognizing that “special solicitude for the privacy of a minor is a pervasive feature of American law”
- finding public’s interest in access, satisfied by release of complaint with plaintiffs’ names redacted
- authorizing redaction of complaint to include only initials of minor plaintiff and her family
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Messitte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.