M.P. v. GUIRIBITEY COSMETIC & BEAUTY INSTITUTE, INC., etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government is not required to explain reasons for its sentencing recommendation unless it agreed to do so in the plea agreement
• holding that there is no requirement for the Government to “enthusiastically” make a certain recommendation or to provide reasons for a recommendation, absent an agreement to do so
• holding error for courts to “imply as a matter of law a term which the parties themselves did not agree upon”
• stating that a criminal defendant has no right to an “enthusiastic” recommendation by the prosecutor in order to achieve compliance with a plea agreement
• holding the prosecutor is not obligated to “enthusiastically” recommend the sentence set forth in the agreement
• holding “it was error for the Court of Appeals to imply as a matter of law a term which the parties themselves did not agree upon” by requiring recommendation to be made “enthusiastically”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).