Mozee v. Kuplen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding 11 fourth requirement that “the breach caused injury to the plaintiff.”
• “premium all-natural flavors” non-actionable, the term “premium” “has no concrete, discernable meaning in the diet soda context”
• sweeteners are not “flavors” because “they do not give the product an original taste—rather, they sweeten or amplify whatever characterizing flavor it has from another source”
• stating elements of express warranty claim in California
• “To prevail on a breach of express warranty 19 claim, a plaintiff must prove that the seller (1) made an affirmation of fact or promise or 20 provided a description of its goods; (2) the promise or description formed part of the basis 21 of the bargain; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).