Moyer v. Roy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]he Tort Claims Act’s notice requirement is a jurisdictional prerequisite, not a shield against liability”
• explaining that notice is prerequisite to subject-matter jurisdiction and question of law reviewed de novo
• stating that actual notice requires, among other things, knowledge of property damage and identity of parties involved
• stating that actual notice can often be determined as matter of law, even “when subjective awareness must be proved, if at all, by circumstantial evidence”
• stating that actual notice can often be determined as matter of law even “when subjective awareness must be proved, if at all, by circumstantial evidence”
• stating that “mere knowledge that something happened somewhere to someone or something would hardly ever” constitute actual notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).