Skip to main content
· 12/15/1906

Moxley v. Hertz

Citations

  • 173 F. 728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[t]he prohibition of lay representation of limited liability companies under Rule 1:21-1(c) is clear and unambiguous.\
  • finding \[t]he prohibition of lay representation of limited liability companies under Rule 1:21- 1(c) is clear and unambiguous.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grosscup

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.