Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/16/1956
Mower v. Mower
Citations
- 121 A.2d 185
- 209 Md. 413
- 1956 Md. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when a divorce a mensa is denied, the court still retains jurisdiction and should decide who shall be awarded custody and support pursuant to Art. 16 § 34
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruñe, Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson, Hammond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Colburn v. ColburnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-29· cited 41×
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-03-17· cited 24×
- Zulauf v. ZulaufCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-15· cited 20×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-03-25· cited 18×
- Zink v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-12-23· cited 15×
- Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-05-10· cited 13×
- Thurlow v. ThurlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-01· cited 12×
- Besche v. BescheCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-04-04· cited 12×
- Fortman v. FortmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-06-28· cited 6×
- Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-03-16· cited 6×
- Parsons v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-12-11· cited 2×
- Buchholtz v. BuchholtzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-10-07· cited 2×
- Hill v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-12· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.