· 4/28/2005
Movitz v. Baker (In Re Triple Star Welding, Inc.)
Citations
- 324 B.R. 778
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 885
- 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 213
- 2005 WL 1223602
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘facially plausible’ preference claim [against proposed counsel] ... must be resolved before proposed counsel can be employed (or compensated)”
- valid employment under § 327(a) is a prerequisite to compensation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montali, Smith and Zive
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.