Skip to main content
· 4/28/2005

Movitz v. Baker (In Re Triple Star Welding, Inc.)

Citations

  • 324 B.R. 778
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 885
  • 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 213
  • 2005 WL 1223602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘facially plausible’ preference claim [against proposed counsel] ... must be resolved before proposed counsel can be employed (or compensated)”
  • valid employment under § 327(a) is a prerequisite to compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montali, Smith and Zive

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.