Movers Conference of America v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where Cammer 1, 2, and 4 weighed in plaintiffs' favor, Cammer 3 was partially unsatisfied, and Cammer 5 did not favor either the plaintiffs or the defendants, plaintiffs' evidence was sufficient to establish market efficiency by a preponderance of the evidence
• adopting event study which used as news days all sixteen earnings release dates in the almost four year class period
• “[The preponderance] standard appears to be the trend in federal courts[.]”
• “[The preponderance] standard appears to be the trend in federal courts[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).