Mouton v. Thibodeaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding noncompliance 6 with ARL sufficiently states claim under \unlawful\ and \unfair\ prongs of § 17200
• “Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff 14 plausibly alleges that Defendant’s conduct or practices violates the [California Automatic 15 Renewal Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17600 et seq.], and therefore, Plaintiff plausibly 16 alleges a UCL claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).