Moutinho v. Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is clear . . . that a lessee may have a sufficient interest in leased property to be aggrieved by a zoning decision affecting that property.”
• when the evidence establishes the existence of an oral agreement and the intent of the parties to abide by that agreement, “after the fulfillment of a contingency,” such as the decision of a zoning board, “a substantial and legitimate interest” in the property exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).