MOUSSA GOULEED v. Wengler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Washington, 434 U.S. 497; that judges might have chosen differently does not undermine trial court’s discretionary determination of manifest necessity
• noting, in habeas corpus context, that defendant’s “interest in controlling the course of his trial was not dispositive” because “there was manifest necessity to grant a new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).